Active noise control

Active noise control (ANC) (also known as noise cancellation, or active noise reduction (ANR)) is a method for reducing unwanted sound.

Contents

Explanation

Sound is a P-wave, which consists of a compression phase and a rarefaction phase. A noise-cancellation speaker emits a sound wave with the same amplitude but with inverted phase (also known as antiphase) to the original sound. The waves combine to form a new wave, in a process called interference, and effectively cancel each other out - an effect which is called phase cancellation.

Modern active noise control is generally achieved through the use of analog circuits or Digital Signal Processing. Adaptive algorithms are designed to analyze the waveform of the background aural or nonaural noise, then based on the specific algorithm generates a signal that will either phase shift or invert the polarity of the original signal. This inverted signal (in antiphase) is then amplified and a transducer creates a sound wave directly proportional to the amplitude of the original waveform creating destructive interference. This will effectively reduce the volume of the perceivable noise.

A noise-cancellation speaker may be co-located with the sound source to be attenuated. In this case it must have the same audio power level as the source of the unwanted sound. Alternatively, the transducer emitting the cancellation signal may be located at the location where sound attenuation is wanted (e.g. the user's ear). This requires a much lower power level for cancellation but is effective only for a single user. Noise cancellation at other locations is more difficult as the three dimensional wavefronts of the unwanted sound and the cancellation signal could match and create alternating zones of constructive and destructive interference. In small enclosed spaces (e.g. the passenger compartment of a car) such global cancellation can be achieved via multiple speakers and feedback microphones, and measurement of the modal responses of the enclosure.

Applications

Applications can be "1-dimensional" or 3-dimensional, depending on the type of zone to protect. Periodic sounds, even complex ones, are easier to cancel than random sounds due to the repetition in the wave form.

Protection of a "1-dimension zone" is easier and requires only one or two microphones and speakers to be effective. Several commercial applications have been successful: noise-cancelling headphones, active mufflers, and the control of noise in air conditioning ducts. The term "1-dimension" refers to a simple pistonic relationship between the noise and the active speaker (mechanical noise reduction) or between the active speaker and the listener (headphones).

Protection of a 3-dimension zone requires many microphones and speakers, making it more expensive. Each of the speakers tends to interfere with nearby speakers, reducing the system's overall performance. Noise reduction is more easily achieved with a single listener remaining stationary but if there are multiple listeners or if the single listener turns his head or moves throughout the space then the noise reduction challenge is made much more difficult. High frequency waves are difficult to reduce in three dimensions due to their relatively short audio wavelength in air. The wavelength in air of sinusoidal noise at approximately 800 Hz is double the distance of the average person's left ear to the right ear;[1] such a noise coming directly from the front will be easily reduced by an active system but coming from the side will tend to cancel at one ear while being reinforced at the other, making the noise louder, not softer.[2] High frequency sounds above 1000 Hz tend to cancel and reinforce unpredictably from many directions. In sum, the most effective noise reduction in three dimensional space involves low frequency sounds. Commercial applications of 3-D noise reduction include the protection of aircraft cabins and car interiors, but in these situations, protection is mainly limited to the cancellation of repetitive (or periodic) noise such as engine-, propeller- or rotor-induced noise. This is because an engine's cyclic nature makes FFT analysis and the noise canceling easier to apply.

Different Types of Active Noise Control

Global Free Space Cancellation: The total annihilation of a sound field in three dimensions. May be utilized in submarines and household appliances.

Pros

Cons

Cavity and Duct Cancellation: Generally used in confined spaces where reflections from the walls create modal responses, which are generally present whenever the wavelength of the acoustic wave approaches or decreases below the dimensions of the cavity. This system is often used in air conditioning ducts and headphones.

Pros

Cons

Zone of Silence Cancellation: Provides a localized cancellation of sound field intensity in a very small region of the overall sound field. This is the method used in aircraft cabins. It is also starting to become popular in cars.

Pros

Cons

[3]

Active vs. Passive Noise Control

Noise control is an active or passive means of reducing sound emissions, often incentivised by personal comfort, environmental considerations or legal compliance. Active Noise Control specifically refers to sound reduction that utilizes a power source. Passive Noise control refers to sound reduction by noise isolating materials such as insulation, sound-absorbing tiles, or a muffler rather than a power source.

Active noise canceling is best suited for low frequencies. For higher frequencies, the spacing requirements for Free Space and Zone of Silence techniques become prohibitive. In acoustic cavity and duct based systems, the number of modes grows rapidly with increasing frequency, which quickly makes active noise control techniques unmanageable. Passive treatments become more effective at higher frequencies and often provide an adequate solution without the need for active control.[4]

Advantages of active noise control

Advantages of passive noise control

[6]

History of Active Noise Control

1934 - The first patent for a noise control system was granted to inventor Paul Lueg U.S. Patent 2,043,416. The patent described how to cancel sinusoidal tones in ducts by phase-advancing the wave and cancelling arbitrary sounds in the region around a loudspeaker by inverting the polarity.[7]

1950s - With U.S. Patent 2,866,848, U.S. Patent 2,920,138, U.S. Patent 2,966,549 by Lawrence J. Fogel, systems were created to cancel the noise in helicopter and airplane cockpits.

1957 - Willard Meeker developed a paper design and working model of Active Noise Control applied to a circumaural earmuff. This headset had an active attenuation bandwidth of approximately 50-500 Hz, with a maximum attenuation of approximately 20 dB.[8]

1986 - Dick Rutan and Jeana Yeager used prototype headsets built by Bose in their around-the-world flight.[9][10]

See also

References

  1. ^ Moylan, William (2006). Understanding and crafting the mix: the art of recording. Focal Press. p. 26. ISBN 0240807553. http://books.google.com/books?id=ZgdkVhHUjEMC&pg=PA26. 
  2. ^ The average head is about 21.5 cm (8.5 in) from ear to ear. Assuming the speed of sound is 343 meters per second (1125 feet per second), the full wavelength of a tone of 1600 Hz reaches from ear to ear. A tone of half that frequency, 800 Hz, has a wavelength twice as long. A single such tone coming from the side will appear at the two ears 180 degrees out of phase—one ear compared to the other. An active noise control tone coming from a different angle will not be able to attenuate the original tone in both ears at once.
  3. ^ Active Noise Control, December 2005
  4. ^ Active Noise Control, December 2005
  5. ^ Barrat, Michael; Pool, Sam L. (2008). Principles of Clinical Medicine for Space Flight. Springer. p. 528. ISBN 0387988424. http://books.google.com/books?id=QYrH9P0iPb8C&pg=PA528. 
  6. ^ Noise Reduction in Rooms using Active and Passive Control on the Basis of Modal Analysis, July, 1999
  7. ^ Evaluation of an Improved Active Noise Reduction Microphone using Speech Intelligibility and Performance-Based Testing, n.d.
  8. ^ Evaluation of an Improved Active Noise Reduction Microphone using Speech Intelligibility and Performance-Based Testing, n.d.
  9. ^ Special Lay-Language Paper for the 75th Anniversary Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, May 2004
  10. ^ Escape the Noise: Bose Learning Centre

External links